BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Authors Evaluation
Bregel LV, Efremova OS, Kostik MM. Letter to the Editor: Coronavirus disease 2019, multisystem inflammatory syndrome, and children’s hearts: Finding answers with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. World J Clin Pediatr 2026; 15(4): 122753 [DOI: 10.5409/wjcp.122753]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
Dear Editors and Team of World Journal of Clinical Pediatrics! I want to express my deepest gratitude to the journal and everyone involved in its publication for the opportunity to contribute to such a respected academic platform. Publishing in your journal has been a significant milestone in my professional journey, and I am truly honored that my work met the high standards you uphold. The peer review process was particularly valuable to me. The reviewers’ thoughtful comments and constructive criticism helped me strengthen the arguments in my paper and clarify previously ambiguous areas. Their expertise and attention to detail greatly improved the quality of the final version, and I sincerely appreciate the time and effort they invested in my manuscript. I found the feedback not only rigorous but also supportive, which is a rare and precious combination in academic publishing. I also want to acknowledge the editorial team for their clear communication, prompt responses, and guidance at every stage of the publication process. From the initial submission to the final proofs, your professionalism made the experience smooth and stress‑free. It is evident that the journal’s success is built on the dedication of its staff, and I am grateful for the care you showed toward my work. Your journal plays an essential role in advancing knowledge in our field, and I admire the commitment to maintaining academic integrity and promoting meaningful research. Being part of this community means a great deal to me, and I hope to continue following your publications and, in the future, to contribute again. Thank you once again for your trust, support, and the invaluable opportunity to share my research with a wide and engaged audience. I look forward to witnessing the journal’s continued growth and success. With sincere appreciation, On behalf of the Authors Mikhail Kostik